Significant changes in cyclotorsion and centroid shifts occurred before surgery as well as intraoperatively with both LASIK and PRK, according to a study in the Journal of Refractive Surgery.1
The researchers measured intraoperative cyclorotation and centroid shift in 63 eyes of 34 patients (mean age, 34 years; range, 20-56 years) undergoing either LASIK (n = 30 eyes) or PRK (n = 33 eyes). Preoperatively, the investigators obtained an iris image of each eye with the Visx WaveScan Wavefront System (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.) with iris registration, and they used the Visx Star S4 (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.) to measure cyclotorsion and pupil centroid shift at the beginning of the refractive procedure and after the flap’s creation or epithelial removal.
The mean change in intraoperative cyclorotation was 1.48 ±1.11º in LASIK eyes and 2.02 ±2.63º in PRK eyes. The direction of cyclorotation changed by more than 2º in 21% of eyes after flap creation in the LASIK group and in 32% of eyes after epithelial removal in the PRK group. The respective mean intraoperative shift in the x axis and y axis was 0.13 ±0.15 mm and 0.17 ±0.14 mm, respectively, in LASIK eyes, and 0.09 ±0.07 mm and 0.10 ±0.13 mm, respectively, in PRK eyes. Intraoperative centroid shifts greater than 100 μm in either the x axis or y axis occurred in 71% of LASIK eyes and 55% of PRK eyes.
These data suggest that it may be advantageous to engage iris registration immediately prior to ablation to provide a reference point representative of the eye’s position at the initiation of laser delivery, the researchers concluded.
- Narváez J, Brucks M, Zimmerman G, et al. Intraoperative cyclorotation and pupil centroid shift during LASIK and PRK. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(5):353-358.
TOP 5 ARTICLES FROM 2012
- Piggyback IOLs for Residual Refractive Error After Cataract Surgery
An overview of the indications, contraindications, surgical technique, and complications.
By Jonathan B. Rubenstein, MD
- When My Time for Cataract Surgery Comes
Five surgeons were asked to choose an IOL for their own cataract procedure and explain the rationale for their choices.
By Neiel Baronberg, MD; Steven J. Dell, MD; Mark Packer, MD, CPI; Audrey R. Talley-Rostov, MD; and Robert J. Cionni, MD
- Presbyopia Update 2012: New Technologies and Novel Treatments
By Mitchell C. Shultz, MD
- Cataract Surgery Complication Rates: How Are We Doing?
The femtosecond laser has the potential to improve cataract surgical outcomes and reduce complications, but studies must test this hypothesis.
By David F. Chang, MD
- IOL Choice and Calculations in a Post-RK Patient
By David R. Hardten, MD; Warren E. Hill, MD; William B. Trattler, MD; R. Bruce Wallace III, MD; And Robert T. Crotty, OD